Occupy Bilderberg

This weekend the Bilderberg conference is being held at the Westfield Marriott hotel in Chantilly, Virginia. It is fascinating to see how much media coverage the event is getting, and also how many people on Twitter are talking about it. When I first heard about Bilderberg a couple of years ago, I was intrigued. A meeting of the world’s most powerful people from America and Europe? A secret guest list? A secret agenda? But equallyintriguing was how successfully the group had kept their activities secret. I know how hard it was to find information about the Bilderberg Group because of the months of research I did for my novel, Conspire.

When I started writing Conspire, back in 2010, there was literally only a handful of articles about the conference on the internet – mostly written by the Guardian’s Charlie Skelton. Subsequently, a journalist with some similarities to Charlie Skelton actually made it into Conspire. Jump forward two years, and the Guardian has a whole news section on Bilderberg, and Charlie Skelton’s Bilderblog. There is a  Bilderberg hash tag that seems to be loading tweets at a rate of a few each second, and the Bilderberg Group even has an official website now. But the change I am most interested in is the emergence of a new protest group. You guessed it – Occupy Bilderberg. Here is the group’s press release, explaining their mission. They are correct that there has traditionally been a media blackout of the event, and even though this has changed this year, most main stream press outlets are still ignoring the meeting. And they are also correct that this group does represent the 1%, or perhaps even the 0.01% as I saw one tweet suggest.

When I started writing Conspire, there was no Occupy Movement. It began before I finished the book, so thankfully I did have a chance to add a mention of it among the protestors at my Bilderberg conference. I guess in a way I predicted the future with this inclusion. This isn’t the only major world event I forecasted in the book that happened before I finished it. Now, I’m not saying I’m some sort of spooky Nostradamus. But there are some odd coincidences which also show just how much has been going on in the last two years:

  • The Occupy Movement raises questions about the power of groups like the Bilderbergers, as does the central theme of Conspire.
  • Wikileaks burst onto the world stage. Conspire is all about a journalist’s attempt to uncover what the highest levels of power are planning. And yes, Julian Assange was added into Conspire.
  • The relationship between the Pakistani and American secret service became headline news after the death of Osama Bin Laden. Much of Conspire’s plot centers around the activities of the Pakistani and American/UK secret service.
  • News Corp’s media monopoly has been brought into focus after the hacking scandal and the Leveson inquiry. You can find Murdoch – and the power of the press – in Conspire, though his name is changed to protect the innocent (ie me from being sued!)
  • There has been more open debate about Chinese Cyber Crime, which gets a small but significant mention in the plot of Conspire.

I loved every minute of writing Conspire, and now watching some of my fiction become reality, is just as enjoyable as making it up!

This might be a good time to also formally announce that Conspire has been released. If you would like to occupy Conspire, you can find it on Lulu, and Amazon for Kindle. I’m also working to publish it on the iBookstore.

NOTE: Since posting this yesterday, I’ve had more time to look into the Occupy Bilderberg group. Unfortunately it appears that this group was created by Alex Jones. ‘Who is Alex Jones?’ I hear you ask. Here is an article about who he really is, and suffice to say that the Occupy Movement would like him to stay well away from them. In my novel, Conspire, the Occupy protestors at the Bilderberg conference are real Occupy protestors, not profiteering bigots like Alex Jones. I think it would also be safe to say that, although Alex Jones likes conspiracies and Conspire is all about conspiracies, Alex Jones would hate Conspire.

The Murdoch Conspiracy

Conspire is about conspiracies. If you wanted to count them, you could find at least ten, if not more, intermingled throughout the plot. All are related to politics, the press and power. Some are sinister, some are not. The trick is knowing the difference.

I’m interested in conspiracies. I’m interested in the way that open, democratic and supposedly educated societies are very easily led into thinking they are making decisions through their own self interest, but are actually being ‘brain washed’ by vested interests. My particular fascination of late is the interrelationship between vested interests that fight action against climate change, and activists like myself who try to expose these self interests and enlighten the public that they are being conned. This is not an easy task.This week Rupert Murdoch has been answering questions at the Leveson Enquiry into the culture, practice and ethics of the UK press. It has been clear to me from a very young age that the Murdoch press operates in some ways as a large scale conspiracy. This might make me sound like a paranoid internet troll. But think about it for a second. A conspiracy is defined as:

An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.

The Murdoch press, in the UK, USA and Australia, is chronically addicted to performing illegal, wrongful, or subversive acts. The Leveson Enquiry is showing this in spades. Murdoch has built his media empire to influence the political opinion of the masses, in order to impose his will (or ideology if you like) and get what he wants (more power and more money). We should not take this for granted, yet somehow we do. It was not until his illegal activities were uncovered, in the form of phone hacking, that we paid any close scrutiny to his overall behaviour and influence on our society.

I’ll give you an example of subversive activity that is being played out in Sydney, through Murdoch’s Daily Telegraph newspaper. Most people expect a newspaper to present the news. Amazing that. They expect the news to be a balanced appraisal of the facts. They just want to know what is going on in the world, and expect journalists to be ethically prepared to report facts in an unbiased way. Unfortunately, only a very small percentage of our community thinks about whether this is what they get. Most read the news, believe what they read and never question the motives or ‘vested interests’ of those people producing that news.

In this report called ‘A Skeptical Climate: Media coverage of climate change in Australia’, the authors, who are academics in the field of journalism, found that between February to July 2011, the percentage of stories negative towards the Carbon Price policy compared to stories positive to the policy in the Daily Telegraph was 89%. Balance would be 50%. It’s not hard to see from facts like this that the Murdoch press is waging a war against action to reduce the catastrophic effects of climate change. If you don’t notice this empirically for yourself, then you are being had. Tied to this is their war against climate science, which is equally as blatant for those who care to look.

Under anyone’s definition, the Murdoch press perpetrates conspiracy. Climate change is one area. There are many others. When Murdoch decides who he wants to win an election, they invariably do win. This influence is undemocratic, it’s damaging and until our society wakes up and enlightens itself to the conspiracy, it will go on unchecked into the future.